Help me with college components technology research proposal 8 hours academic double spaced
- Write my paper urge resolved by our experts advancedwriters com
- Need to order custom components technology research proposal 100% original premium double spaced formatting vancouver
- How to order custom research proposal components technology 114 pages / 31350 words american double spaced a4 (british/european)
- Need to purchase college components technology research proposal premium double spaced apa academic
- Best websites to buy research proposal components technology originality 61 pages / 16775 words business a4 (british/european) turabian
- Pedagogy thesis proposal buy online academic essay writing nbsp
- Help me do a research proposal components technology professional academic a4 (british/european) 16 pages / 4400 words rewriting
- Who can do my college research proposal components technology 5 days a4 (british/european) american college junior
- Where to get a research proposal components technology ph.d. 121 pages / 33275 words premium single spaced
- Who can help me write a college pedagogy thesis proposal 8 hours nbsp
Write my paper urge resolved by our experts advancedwriters com
FONT: Use one of the approved typefaces (noting the exception that a font size of less than 10 points may be used for mathematical formulas or equations, figures, table or diagram captions; the key is to keep it easily readable): Arial, Courier New, or Palatino Linotype at a font size of 10 points or larger (Macintosh users also may use Helvetica and Palatino typefaces) Times New Roman at a font size of 11 points or larger Computer Modern family of fonts at a font size of 11 points or larger MARGINS: Must be at least 1 inch in all directions.PAGINATION: Page numbers (and other footer information) can be located within the 1-inch margin; each section of proposal needs to be individually paginated prior to upload to the electronic system (i.
LINE SPACING: The proposal writer can choose whether to single-space or double-space the proposal components, but established page limits must be followed Guidelines on how to write research proposals and theses in the School of Education had last been revised in Year aspects of this guideline to enhance their academic proposal writing skills without any obligations. •The concept paper should not exceed two pages- double spaced and should be shared with potential .LINE SPACING: The proposal writer can choose whether to single-space or double-space the proposal components, but established page limits must be followed.
For the whole story follow this PAPPG Format of the Proposal link.If any specifics given in the individual program solicitation differ from the PAPPG, always defer to the program solicitation instructions Technical Reports Style for Students Online.
If any specifics given in the individual program solicitation differ from the PAPPG, always defer to the program solicitation instructions.
Step-by-step instructions to begin a proposal in Fastlane To start a National Science Foundation (NSF) proposal via Fastlane, you first need to be in their system.Corporate and Foundation Relations (CFR) (also referred to by NSF as the "SPO" or "SRO" - sponsored projects office or sponsored research office) will set up an account to generate an NSF ID number and will assign a temporary password equine-research-inc.com/paper/geography.php.Corporate and Foundation Relations (CFR) (also referred to by NSF as the "SPO" or "SRO" - sponsored projects office or sponsored research office) will set up an account to generate an NSF ID number and will assign a temporary password.Call CFR (507-222-4441 or 507-222-4046) with questions; follow the Fastlane Help instructions (within the PI Functions link) if you are already have a the Fastlane or account.Alternatively, Fastlane Help offers screen shots with instructions: for example, for PI or Co-PI Login (in left sidebar select Proposal Functions, Log in to Proposal Functions, PI and Co-PI Login), or to Create a New Proposal (on main page, select Prepare a Proposal, Create a Proposal).
CFR staff will also be happy to do this step - of creating a new proposal - for you, if you wish, using your Fastlane ID and password.
Components of an NSF proposal Required pieces A full research proposal submitted via FastLane must contain the following sections (also refer to the Exhibit II-1: Proposal Preparation Checklist): Cover Sheet: the place to indicate program announcement/solicitation number, title, proposed duration and start date, PI/coPIs; see more at PAPPG Chapter II.a Project Summary: a 1-page summary, written in the third person and containing the 3 mandatory sections of Overview, Project Description: the project narrative (usually limited to 15 pages), providing a clear statement of the work and addressing the program announcement specifications.This document must include a section labeled "Broader Impacts" and a section "Results from Prior NSF Support" (when applicable; best place for a PI to show how she's successfully used previous NSF grants); more at PAPPG Chapter II.
d References Cited: a list (with no page limitation) of bibliographic citations in the project description, with each reference providing the name of all authors; the publication title; appropriate publication information such as publication year and site and/or periodical volume number and page numbers; and website address (if the publication is available electronically); see PAPPG Chapter II.e Biographical Sketch(es): a "bio sketch" (limited to 2 pages each) is required for each individual identified as senior personnel; NSF format differs significantly from a regular CV: see the specifics online via PAPPG Chapter II.The four sections required are Professional Preparation, Appointments, Products, and Synergistic Activities.
There is allowance for additional biographical information to be included, such as for auxiliary users of instrumentation in Equipment Proposals, or for "Other Personnel" that merit consideration in the evaluation of the proposal.Budget and Budget Justification: the budget includes specific sections (refer to PAPPG Chapter II.g); amounts for each budget line item requested must be documented in the budget justification (which can be no more than three pages long): each subaward must contain a separate budget justification (also limited to three pages).Current and Pending Support: for each individual identified as senior personnel there needs to be a listing of all current and pending support for ongoing projects and proposals, including the project being proposed, from any source, that require a portion of time, including the proposed project and internal funds allocated toward specific projects.Time commitment is expressed in person-months per year; see the FAQs below and the PAPPG Current and Pending Support.Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources: an aggregated narrative (with no page limit) describing internal and external resources (both physical and personnel) that Carleton and its collaborators will provide to the project.This must not include any quantifiable financial information.
Collaborators and Other Affiliations (COA): Effective 4/24/17: for each individual identified as senior personnel, NSF requires the submission of a spreadsheet template to identify collaborators and other affiliations.
The COA is uploaded via the Single Copy Documents section; see PAPPG section Collaborators & Other Affiliations Information.Data Management Plan a supplementary document (limit of 2 pages), the "DMP" describes how investigators will gather, protect, and share the primary data, samples, physical collections and other supporting materials created or gathered in the course of work under NSF grants.j outlines general guidelines for DMP form and content.
Need to order custom components technology research proposal 100% original premium double spaced formatting vancouver
Carleton applicants can obtain advice on developing DMPs on the CFR Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results page and at the University of California's DMPTool website, a free service that helps researchers and institutions to create high-quality data management plans that meet funder requirements.Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan : applicable only when requesting funds to support postdoctoral researchers (limited to 1 page); PAPPG Chapter II.One resource for developing a mentoring plan is the National Postdoctoral Association Sample Academic Proposals from the Purdue OWL public spaces? How do writing centers perform “public scholarship” that sustains us and the community? • How do you build a self-sustaining ecology in your writing center through Engagement Scholarship: Usability Research and Participatory Design in College-..One resource for developing a mentoring plan is the National Postdoctoral Association.
Letters of Collaboration:provided typically when a collaborator is not included in the budget, and is to use specific language prescribed by NSF.Under Special Information and Supplementary Documentation, at the bullet point starting with "Documentation of collaborative arrangements.
" the highly recommended format for letters of collaboration is given as follows: "If the proposal submitted by Dr.insert the full name of the Principal Investigator entitled insert the proposal title is selected for funding by NSF, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the Project Description or the Facilities, Equipment or Other Resources section of the proposal equine-research-inc.com/term-paper/medical-sciences.php.insert the full name of the Principal Investigator entitled insert the proposal title is selected for funding by NSF, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the Project Description or the Facilities, Equipment or Other Resources section of the proposal." RUI Impact Statement and Certification of RUI/ROA Eligibility: needed IF submitting as an RUI (Research in Undergraduate Institutions) proposal (5-page limit).Checklist This Exhibit II-1: Proposal Preparation Checklist highlights certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared.
Collaborative research projects Collaborative Proposals are those in which investigators from two or more organizations wish to collaborate on a unified research project.
A collaborative proposal may be submitted to NSF in one of two methods: as a single proposal, in which a single award is being requested with subawards administered by the lead organization to the non-lead institutions or coPIs.as a simultaneous submission of proposals from different organizations, with each organization requesting a separate award.When involved with a separately submitted simultaneous collaborative project, the lead institution provides all the pieces listed above (under Required Pieces), and the non-lead collaborators provide Cover Sheet, Biographical Sketch(es), Budget, Budget Justification, Current and Pending Support and Facilities (Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources).This way - of simultaneous submission of the collaborative proposal from multiple organizations - is preferred whenever possible due to less administrative burden for the lead organization, quicker access to funding for the non-lead organization, cleaner reporting responsibilities for both; the exception is when the work of the non-lead organization is more contractual in scope rather than as a subaward.Process for simultaneous submission of a collaborative proposal: (i) Each non-lead organization must assign their proposal a proposal PIN.
This proposal PIN and the temporary proposal ID generated by FastLane when the non-lead proposal is created must be provided to the lead organization before the lead organization submits its proposal to NSF.(ii) The lead organization must then enter each non-lead organization(s) proposal PIN and temporary proposal ID into the FastLane lead proposal by using the "Link Collaborative Proposals" option found on the FastLane "Form Preparation" screen.If we are submitting a single proposal with subaward/s, we MUST document the determination of subaward versus contract using this form.For more, read the explanation in the PAPPG Chapter II.3, or refer to Fastlane Help (search for specific step, i.Significant or Recent Changes Changes listed below result from annual updates to the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) annually, and the federal OMB "Uniform Guidance" rules effective 12/26/14.Changes resulting from the most recent PAPPG (NSF 18-1) are indicated by " Starting 1/29/18:.
" and changes from past versions of the PAPPG are indicated by date (i.Starting 1/29/18: The PAPPG (NSF 18-1) has been modified, with these Significant Changes and Clarifications to the PAPPG.
Most notably, the budget justification page limit has increased from 3 pages to up to 5 pages in length, and the Project Description must now contain a separate section specifically identified as "Intellectual Merit." Project Summary Starting 1/30/17 and continuing: the project summary no longer has a 4,600 character limitation, but must fit on one page, and is to be written in third person and have three separate sections (enforced by separate text boxes in Fastlane).The three sections are 1) Overview, 2) Intellectual Merit, 3) Broader Impacts.
How to order custom research proposal components technology 114 pages / 31350 words american double spaced a4 (british/european)
You can read a brief description for each section in the PAPPG section Project Summary.Project DescriptionStarting 1/29/18: In addition to a section on "Broader Impacts," the Project Description must contain a separate section labeled " Intellectual Merit"; read more online here.
Starting 1/29/18: For Results from Prior NSF Support, language is clarified to indicate that information on the award is required, regardless of whether the support was directly related to the proposal or not, if any PI or coPI identified on the proposal has received NSF support including an award with an any Starting to present with PAPPG 18-1, URLs must Biographical Sketch Biographical sketches are required all Senior Personnel, and are to be uploaded for each individual listed as senior personnel At our custom essay writing service get a brilliant research paper, essay, term paper to be successful in your academic life. Thesis and Write my pedagogy thesis proposal 5 days ASA double spaced quality Who can help me write a college pedagogy thesis proposal 8 hours Writing from scratch Academic quality..Starting 1/29/18: For Results from Prior NSF Support, language is clarified to indicate that information on the award is required, regardless of whether the support was directly related to the proposal or not, if any PI or coPI identified on the proposal has received NSF support including an award with an any Starting to present with PAPPG 18-1, URLs must Biographical Sketch Biographical sketches are required all Senior Personnel, and are to be uploaded for each individual listed as senior personnel.
Starting 1/25/16 and continuing after 1/29/18: as needed, additional biographical information may be included with the proposal, such as for auxiliary users of instrumentation in Equipment Proposals, or for "Other Personnel" of (a) Postdoctoral associates, (b) Other professionals, or (c) Students (research assistants) with exceptional qualifications that merit consideration in the evaluation of the proposal.The biographical information is to be grouped together and clearly identified as either " Equipment Proposal" biographical information and uploaded as a single PDF file, or as " Other Personnel” biographical information and uploaded as a single PDF file, in the Other Supplementary Documents section of the proposal research proposals University of Queensland.The biographical information is to be grouped together and clearly identified as either " Equipment Proposal" biographical information and uploaded as a single PDF file, or as " Other Personnel” biographical information and uploaded as a single PDF file, in the Other Supplementary Documents section of the proposal.To learn what to provide in each instance, follow the links above from the PAPPG Biographical Sketch(es).Professional Preparation - We are to provide the location of the individual's undergraduate, graduate, and postdoctoral institution(s): city, state or province, country if necessary.
Products - The section previously named "Publications" is now best labeled "Products do my custom technical communication thesis proposal Standard Academic Writing from scratch.Products - The section previously named "Publications" is now best labeled "Products." If only publications are included, it can be named "Publications." If various items are included in this section - such as data sets, software, patents, and copyrights, instead of or in addition to publications - then label it " Products." Collaborators & Other Affiliations Information Effective 4/24/17:NSF requires the submission of a spreadsheet template to identify collaborators and other affiliations.
In the budget and budget justification we must be careful to NOT mention any kind of cost sharing.For the types of grants that the college seeks, NSF has a strict ban on voluntary committed cost sharing.Institutional support or contributions to the project can be talked about in the "Facilities, Equipment or Other Resources" document, but always without mentioning dollar amounts." Equipment" (Line D on the Proposal Budget) is still defined as tangible property with a per-unit acquisition cost of $5,000 or above, but rules addressing procurement have changed.
When intending to purchase any item with a cost of , so stay tuned.NOTE: a computing device purchase with cost of up to $5,000 is considered a supply and should be listed in Line G1 "Other Direct Costs - Materials and Supplies." A direct costs if 1) administrative or clerical services are integral to a project or activity, 2) individual/s can be specifically identified with the project or activity, 3) such costs are explicitly included in the budget or have the prior written approval of the NSF (see CFR staff for example of a justification statement to use for "prior written approval"), and 4) the costs are not also recovered as indirect costs.If your project includes a subaward, contact CFR and the Business Office for assistance with specific requirements for pass-through entities (i., the College, acting as fiscal agent) around monitoring and forms needed (for example, we must document the determination of subaward vs.Read more below in the "About Budgets" section, and in the PAPPG Budget and Budget Justification section.Supplementary Documentation : Letters of collaboration are to use a specified format.
Under Special Information and Supplementary Documentation, at the bullet point starting with "Documentation of collaborative arrangements.
" the highly recommended format for letters of collaboration is given as follows: "If the proposal submitted by Dr.insert the full name of the Principal Investigator entitled insert the proposal title is selected for funding by NSF, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the Project Description or the Facilities, Equipment or Other Resources section of the proposal." Reporting Annual project reports should be submitted no later than 90 calendar days prior to the end of each annual budget period.NSF system sends automated report reminders starting 3 months before the end of annual budget period stating that the report is due; the report is not overdue until the day after the annual budget period.
Need to purchase college components technology research proposal premium double spaced apa academic
Final project reports and project outcomes reports for the general public must be submitted no later than 120 days following expiration of the grant.
Public Access Policy A newer policy at NSF intends to expand public access to the results of its funded research.If receiving an award based on a proposal submitted, or due, on or after 1/25/16, then the Public Access requirement applies: you will need to deposit publications in the NSF Public Access Repository (NSF-PAR) (sign in to and choose 'Deposit Publication' from My Desktop) NSF Proposal Specifics Corporate and nbsp Carleton College.If receiving an award based on a proposal submitted, or due, on or after 1/25/16, then the Public Access requirement applies: you will need to deposit publications in the NSF Public Access Repository (NSF-PAR) (sign in to and choose 'Deposit Publication' from My Desktop).
Refer also to - NSF’s Public Access plan (NSF 15-52) To see descriptions of budget categories, as laid out by NSF, go to the PAPPG section Budget and Budget Justification.For a budget template spreadsheet based on NSF budget categories, go to Business Office Forms page, and under the heading "Government & Foundation Grant Forms" open "Research Grant Proposed Budget Template." For current figures to use in budget preparation - such as Carleton College faculty and student compensation guidelines, benefit percentages, indirect cost rate, and more - contact CFR (Dee 507-222-4441, Charlotte 507-222-4046, or Christopher 507-222-5833).
The budget JUSTIFICATION is where each line item requested is documented and justified.Items and amounts need to be considered necessary, reasonable, allocable, and allowable.The budget justification can be no more than 3 pages.PARTICIPANT SUPPORT COSTSrefer to direct costs (such as stipends, or subsistence or travel allowances, registration fees) paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with NSF-sponsored conferences or training projects.Indirect costs are NOT allowed on participant support costs.
Participant support costs will be accounted for separately should an award be made.INDIRECT COSTS are a line item in nearly every proposal budget submitted to a federal agency.In contrast to straightforward project expenses of "direct costs" (such as salary, benefits, equipment, travel, supplies), indirect costs are - as NSF describes - "those costs which are not readily identifiable with a particular cost objective but nevertheless are necessary to the general operation of an organization." An Indirect Cost Rate (IDC) agreement is negotiated with a Federal agency every four years.Carleton's IDC rate agreement, which was negotiated with the Department of Health & Human Services based on our Audited Financial Statements for the period ending June 30, 2014, has been approved at a rate of58% for federal grants with award dates of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019.
The Business Office government grant proposal page explains that the rate is "calculated on the total of all faculty or technician salaries/stipends and undergraduate student stipends." The indirect cost rate in effect at the time of the initial awarding of a grant is in effect throughout the life of the grant.A SUBAWARD budget can be entered into Fastlane by either the lead organization or the subawardee (the subaward organization, if not a coPI, gains access to the proposal as an OAU other authorized user and uses the temporary proposal number created in Fastlane and PIN assigned by the lead organization).To input a subaward budget, contact CFR (x4441) or utilize Fastlane Help and search "Create a Budget for the Subcontracting Organization." Each subawardee is EFFORT is recorded in any budget, and expressed in person months; see the FAQ (below) "What are person months and how do I calculate them?" Compliance specifics What do I need to do to be compliant with federal requirements? Each organization receiving funding from a federal agency needs to certify that the institution and individuals are following specified federal guidelines.
Carleton asks all primary investigators (PI and coPIs) involved in a proposal to a federal governmental agency (NSF, NIH, NEH, etc.) to read and sign a Compliance & Disclosure Form.The form addresses college policies and provides a checklist with links addressing I) financial conflicts of interest, II) human or animal subject involvement, III) responsible conduct of research, and IV) environmental health and safety issues.What is a "Data Management Plan"? Any proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation must include a supplemental "Data Management Plan" (no more than two pages in length) which demonstrates how the principal investigator of the proposed project will comply with the NSF’s Data Sharing Policy, as published in the PAPPG Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results.(The requirement was formally enforced starting in January 2011.
) For more, see the CFR's Sharing of Research Results web page and use the "Data Management Plan Template" to develop a statement which satisfies the requirements of the policy.
Best websites to buy research proposal components technology originality 61 pages / 16775 words business a4 (british/european) turabian
NSF applicants can also receive assistance in preparing Data Management Plans from Paula Lackie, Academic Technologist (Leighton Hall 225; [email protected] or x5607) and Kristin Partlo, Reference & Instruction Librarian for Social Sciences & Data (Gould Library 466; [email protected] or x7668).Paula and Kristin are well prepared to help with all phases of the development of a DMP.What is RCR and how do I comply? RCR stands for " conduct of research Sample Academic Proposals the Purdue University Online Writing Lab.What is RCR and how do I comply? RCR stands for " conduct of research.
" The submitting organization must certify and the PI must "describe in its grant proposal a plan to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research to undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers participating in the proposed research project.
Go to the CFR page Responsible Conduct of Research to link to our free online training course and to obtain more specific information Of course, reports should always be typed, double-spaced on 8-1/2 x 11 paper on one side of the page only, and letter-quality print or better is expected. Stylistically, literature reviews are often written in the past tense, but many authors favor the present tense when the research being summarized was completed recently..Go to the CFR page Responsible Conduct of Research to link to our free online training course and to obtain more specific information.When do I need to obtain IRB approval for my proposed project?The federal government requires that all research involving human subjects conducted by an institution that receives federal funding be reviewed in advance by an IRB (Institutional Research Board) at the institution Of course, reports should always be typed, double-spaced on 8-1/2 x 11 paper on one side of the page only, and letter-quality print or better is expected. Stylistically, literature reviews are often written in the past tense, but many authors favor the present tense when the research being summarized was completed recently..When do I need to obtain IRB approval for my proposed project?The federal government requires that all research involving human subjects conducted by an institution that receives federal funding be reviewed in advance by an IRB (Institutional Research Board) at the institution.Carleton's IRB web pages outline specifics on how to apply, and address FAQs (with helps such as IRB Quiz (Does My Project Require an IRB Application?) latin american studies.Carleton's IRB web pages outline specifics on how to apply, and address FAQs (with helps such as IRB Quiz (Does My Project Require an IRB Application?).For projects lacking definite plans for the use of human subjects (human subject persons, data, or their specimens), pursuant to 45 CFR 690.
118, NSF will accept a determination notice (use this sample template that is to be signed by AOR/Dean of the College) establishing a limited time period under which the Principal Investigator (PI) may conduct preliminary or conceptual work that does not involve human subjects.Certification of IRB approval needs to be provided by the institution to the funding agency before human subjects research begins.When do I need to include a postdoc supplementary document? If your proposal requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers, the Supplementary Documentation section must include "a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals." Proposers are advised that the mentoring plan may not be used to circumvent the 15-page project description limitation.In no more than one page, the mentoring plan must describe the mentoring that will be provided to all postdoctoral researchers supported by the project, irrespective of whether they reside at the submitting organization, any subawardee organization, or at any organization participating in a simultaneously submitted collaborative project.
The Special Information and Supplementary Documentation section includes specifics and examples of mentoring plan activities.If the proposal is collaborative and includes support of a postdoc researcher at any of the collaborating institutions,the lead organization's submission must include a supplemental mentoring plan not to exceed one page, addressing the mentoring activities to be provided for all postdoctoral researchers supported under the entire collaborative project.What criteria are used to review my proposal? All proposals submitted to NSF are reviewed utilizing the two merit review criteria of Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts.Since NSF urges reviewers to consider these five review elements (listed below and here) on both criteria, principal investigators should - through the use of appropriate subheadings, italicized and boldfaced text, and other formatting - make it easy for reviewers to find language in their proposal’s project description and related documents that will let the reviewer score the project positively against these elements.
What is the potential for the proposed activity toa.advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields Intellectual Merit ;b.benefit society or advance desired societal outcomes Broader Impacts ?2.To what extent do the proposed activities suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts? 3.Is the plan for carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Does the plan incorporate a mechanism to assess success? 4.
How well qualified is the individual, team, or institution to conduct the proposed activities? 5.Are there adequate resources available to the PI (either at the home institution or through collaborations) to carry out the proposed activities? Reviewers are asked to fill in this grid with comment(s) in each quadrant:NSF’s “Revised NSF Merit Review Criteria” slide presentation from October 2012, outlines criteria implemented in and in force after January 2013.The University of Missouri Broader Impacts Network (BIN) was established in 2012 as a response to the National Science Foundation’s emphasis on the integration of education and outreach into research projects.The BIN has as its mission “to assist researchers in the development, implementation, and evaluation of high-quality broader impacts activities.
” Find helps such as: Create a broader impacts planand Evaluate my broader impacts activities.
Pedagogy thesis proposal buy online academic essay writing nbsp
This publication presents highlights from the Broader Impacts Infrastructure Summit in April 2014, including perspectives from NSF, university leaders, and university participants.Included are examples of approaches used by various PIs to ensure the scientific and societal relevance of their research.The article acknowledges BIONIC (Broader Impacts and Outreach Network for Institutional Collaboration), a five-year project funded by a National Science Foundation Research Coordination Network grant (award abstract #1408736, started August 2014), in support of professionals who assist researchers in designing, implementing, and evaluating the broader impacts activities for NSF proposals and awards LINE SPACING: The proposal writer can choose whether to single-space or double-space the proposal components, but established page limits must be followed. Corporate and Foundation Relations (CFR) (also referred to by NSF as the SPO or SRO - sponsored projects office or sponsored research office) will set up .
The article acknowledges BIONIC (Broader Impacts and Outreach Network for Institutional Collaboration), a five-year project funded by a National Science Foundation Research Coordination Network grant (award abstract #1408736, started August 2014), in support of professionals who assist researchers in designing, implementing, and evaluating the broader impacts activities for NSF proposals and awards.
Important Notes about "Broader Impacts" The Project Description must include a section labeled “ Broader Impacts” (explained in the Content section of PAPPG Chapter II.d) that addresses the project’s potential broader impacts, which (the NSF proposal guide states) “may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to the project.NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to the achievement of societally relevant outcomes.
Such outcomes include, but are not limited to:full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM);improved STEM education and educator development at any level;increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology;improved well-being of individuals in society;development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce;increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others;improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the United States; andenhanced infrastructure for research and education.” Who are senior personnel? The term "senior personnel" describes PI/co-PIs who are "responsible for the scientific or technical direction of the project," along with other key personnel involved such as faculty associates.For all senior personnel, a biographical sketch and current and pending support information are required.A distinct additional category is "Other personnel" that includes postdoctoral scholars, other professionals, graduate students, undergraduate students, and miscellaneous others working on the project in a non-research capacity.For more explanation, see the PAPPG Exhibit II-7: Definitions of Categories of Personnel.
What are person months and how do I calculate them? The current project support from whatever source ( e., Federal, State, local or foreign government agencies, public or private foundations, industrial or other commercial organizations, or internal funds allocated toward specific projects) must be listed.The proposed project and all other projects or activities requiring a portion of time of the PI and other senior personnel must be included, even if they receive no salary support from the project(s).The total award amount for the entire award period covered (including indirect costs) must be shown as well as the number of person-months per year to be devoted to the project, regardless of source of support.
Similar information must be provided for all proposals already submitted or submitted concurrently to other possible sponsors, including NSF." At Carleton, we interpret this guidance to mean that "start up funds" should be included in the statement of current & pending support.Here's more from the NSF Frequently Asked Questions publication (go to "P" for "Person-Months"): What is the definition of "person-months"? The term "person-months" refers to the effort (amount of time) that PI/coPI(s), faculty, and other senior personnel will devote to a specific project.The effort is based on the organization's regular academic-year, summer, or calendar-year.For example, if the regular schedule is 10 months and 30% effort will be devoted to the project, a total of 3 months should be listed in the academic or calendar-year block (10 months x 30% = 3 months).
How do I calculate the person-months per year committed to the project? "Multiply the percentage of your effort associated with the project times the number of months of your appointment ( i., 10% of a 9 month AY appointment equals 0.9 person months; 10% of a 12 month calendar appointment equals 1.
Person months shown in the current and pending support section should usually equal the number of months on the NSF proposal budget." OR, if you know the number of hours, days, or weeks to be devoted to the project, person-months can be obtained by calculating the portion.For example, working 5 days on a project = 1 week/4 total weeks in a month = 0.Since a month includes a working day or two more than four weeks, an alternate way to calculate would be 5 days/22 work days in a month = 0.
Help me do a research proposal components technology professional academic a4 (british/european) 16 pages / 4400 words rewriting
Simply said Using weeks: multiply number of Using days: multiply days by 0.If the time varies in each year, calculate yearly person months and then average them for the final number to report on the NSF Current and Pending form.If devoting a term to research, the academic year person months can be calculated using 1/3 of 9-month appointment - that is, 3 Minimize · Academic Calendar · Class Schedule · Important Student Calendars · Academic Bulletin · Campus Directory · Registrar · Student Accounts · Financial Aid · Dean of Students / Student Policies · Student Health Insurance · Research & Sponsored Programs/IRB · Ombuds · International Students · Human Resources..If devoting a term to research, the academic year person months can be calculated using 1/3 of 9-month appointment - that is, 3.
0 academic months (1/3 for Carleton's trimester system).Note in this regard that NSF states that "if anticipated, any compensation for such personnel in excess of two months must be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and must be specifically approved by NSF in the award notice.
" If your NSF-funded research will be conducted during the summer months, use 2.0 summer months - even if you propose to work 10 weeks rather than 8 weeks equine-research-inc.com/dissertation/how-to-order-a-family-law-dissertation-66-pages-18150-words-single-spaced-writing-from-scratch.0 summer months - even if you propose to work 10 weeks rather than 8 weeks.As stated in NSF's PAPPG Senior Personnel Salaries & Wages Policy"As a general policy, NSF limits the salary compensation requested in the proposal budget for senior personnel to no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year.This limit includes salary compensation received from all NSF-funded grants.This effort must be documented in accordance with 2 CFR § 200, Subpart E, including 2 CFR § 200.
If anticipated, any compensation for such personnel in excess of two months must be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and must be specifically approved by NSF in the award notice budget." (Note that the National Institutes of Health guidelines are different, and permit asking for up to 3.Can I compensate a colleague from another institution as part of my research project? If your project involves a collaborator at an institution other than Carleton, you may need to include a subaward or contract.
Documentation of the decision to include another entity - whether subrecipient or contractor - is required.Complete the checklist and sign this form.What might cause my proposal to be returned without review? The proposal 2.is submitted with insufficient lead-time before the activity is scheduled to begin; 3.is a full proposal that was submitted by a proposer that has received a “not invited” response to the submission of a preliminary proposal (see Invite/Not Invite); 4.
is a duplicate of, or substantially similar to, a proposal already under consideration by NSF from the same submitter (see Submission Instructions);5.does not meet NSF proposal preparation requirements, such as page limitations, formatting instructions, and electronic submission, as specified in the guidelines (see PAPPG Conformance with Instructions for Proposal Preparation and Format of the Proposal), the NSF Application Guide, or program solicitation; 6.is not responsive to the NSF funding opportunity; 7.does not meet an announced proposal deadline date; 8.was previously reviewed and declined and has not been substantially revised (see GPG Chapter IV.
duplicates another proposal that was already awarded; and/or 10.does not contain each of the required sections of the proposal, as described in PAPPG Sections of the Proposal.NOTE Proposals submitted in Fastlane will undergo a series of automated proposal compliance validation checks to ensure they comply with requirements as outlined in the PAPPG here.
To view a detailed list of all compliance checks, click here.
Who can do my college research proposal components technology 5 days a4 (british/european) american college junior
What is a dissemination plan? Good dissemination plans do not include only publications/presentations and website content, but encompass "active" methods such as institutional marketing/publicity, social media (by the PI, by the department, by the institution, etc.Particularly for those of you in engineering fields, you might find the reading of journal articles none too stimulating (other than the occasional exciting references to hot presses, cool gels, quickened pulses, or body melds).Nevertheless, at their best, the journal articles you must read are certainly important and carefully crafted Who can help me write my research proposal components technology Oxford Writing from scratch 108 pages / 29700 words 5 days.
Nevertheless, at their best, the journal articles you must read are certainly important and carefully crafted.
The rigid-seeming format and objective style of scientific reports lend them a universal utility so that readers from various disciplines can readily access and use the complex information.Your professors will confirm that busy scientists (who can actually sometimes be characterized as "reader-hostile") rarely read these reports linearly—many readers cut right to "Results and Discussion" or look over the tables and figures before reading anything, then jump around to those bits of the report that are most relevant to their particular needs.Often, their goals are to rapidly exclude information they do not want (or do not trust).In light of the above realities, it is especially important for you to write reports in a fashion acceptable to a journal in your field.As you prepare technical reports for your classes, you have built-in slots in which to put your information, and you plug in to a tried and proven recipe that has evolved over many years.
Understanding this recipe and conforming to it will help you to organize your complex information as well as meet your reader’s specific and sophisticated needs.Self-Study Mechanics Of course, reports should always be typed, double-spaced on 8-1/2 x 11 paper on one side of the page only, and letter-quality print or better is expected.Unless you are instructed otherwise, it is usually standard to include a cover sheet giving the date, your name, the title of the report, the course, and the professor’s name.Tables and figures should be numbered consecutively throughout the text, and, in a thesis or long report, separate lists of tables and figures are normally included at the beginning.Tables and figures should always have descriptive captions, and if they come directly from sources then the sources must be properly credited in the captions.
Never present tables and figures without some useful interpretation of them in the text.Title It is always necessary to have a highly concrete title consisting only of words that contribute directly to the report subject.Be sure that the title contains no filler and includes few abbreviations or acronyms, yet also be certain that it is complete."Sol Gel Method" is clearly incomplete compared to "The Synthesis of NZP by the Sol Gel Method.
" Of course, it is possible to overdo specificity as well: "The Role of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in the Important Scientific Search For Energy Alternatives as Necessitated by the Recent Middle East Crisis and America’s Energy Consumption" is painfully excessive and should be reduced to its essential elements.
Abstract Most reports require an abstract—a condensed summary of the report’s contents.In a journal article, more people will read the abstract than any other part of the paper, so its succinctness and accuracy are vital.The abstract is always self-contained, and is sometimes presented as a separate page.The best abstracts do these things, usually in this order: summarize the specific nature of the investigation; identify the rationale behind the investigation; present the important findings and most significant overall data; briefly interpret the pertinent findings.By necessity, abstracts are often written last, and a good rule of thumb is that the abstract is less than 5 percent of the paper’s total length.
In a thesis, an abstract should fit on one page if possible.Passive voice and past tense verbs are usually appropriate for the purposes of summary, although many journals now print abstracts in the present tense with active voice.What follows is a short excerpt from the opening of an abstract.Note how the first sentence summarizes the nature of the investigation, while the second identifies the rationale: This study determines the locus of rifting at the southern end of the Eastern Branch of the East African Rift System within northern Tanzania.
Where to get a research proposal components technology ph.d. 121 pages / 33275 words premium single spaced
Here, the Eastern Branch diverges into a 300-km-wide area of block faulting, and consequently it is uncertain whether the rifting extends seawards across the Tanzania continental shelf or directly southwards into central Tanzania.
In this study, the locus of rifting is investigated by .Introduction The introduction should offer immediate context for the reader by establishing why the problem being studied is important and by describing the nature and scope of the problem academic writing. o In particular, it will help you follow the Institute's Policy on Academic. Honesty and Integrityas adopted by the Academic Council in June Assignments must be typed, using double spacing on one side of white A4 proposal at degree level, or master's dissertation, may be given specific guidelines for..Introduction The introduction should offer immediate context for the reader by establishing why the problem being studied is important and by describing the nature and scope of the problem.
You should describe your specific approach to the problem and establish how your investigative work meshes with the needs of the field or with other work that has been done.
The so called "funnel system" of organization—moving from a broad approach to a gradually narrowed scope—is highly recommended here.Present tense is also highly favored, especially as you present accepted scientific truths and the objectives of the report.Introductions range from one to several pages in length, and must always include a clearly worded account of the report’s objective, usually at the end of the introduction (Some writers even include a short separate subsection labeled "Objective") help me do an ecommerce case study Formatting Undergrad Premium.Introductions range from one to several pages in length, and must always include a clearly worded account of the report’s objective, usually at the end of the introduction (Some writers even include a short separate subsection labeled "Objective").Most journals allow "we" or "our" to be used in the introduction, especially as you outline your objectives or summarize the common goals of researchers.Here is an ideal opening sentence from a report introduction.
Note how it launches the reader directly into the science: To produce highly reliable metal-ceramic joints, we must fully understand the joining mechanisms.Therefore, today’s ceramic scientists aim to .Literature Review When articles appear in journals, the most noteworthy literature will usually be reviewed only briefly in the introduction or as it becomes relevant.
In technical reports and theses for your classes, however, an entire section of your paper may well be devoted to a literature review.Literature reviews range from exhaustive searches to summaries of only the most germane articles, but the fundamental objective is always the same: to establish the history of the problem being investigated by summarizing the WHAT, HOW, and WHY of the work that has already been done.Writing a literature review requires you to establish relationships among findings from other researchers and to condense many pages of published material into shorter segments.Therefore, your ability to assimilate material and, in effect, tell your own story, becomes critical.Stylistically, literature reviews are often written in the past tense, but many authors favor the present tense when the research being summarized was completed recently.
Passive voice may seem tempting to use, but active voice will serve you well here, because you can smoothly place the names of authors into the subject slot of the sentence: Yoldas and Lloyd (1999) propose a chemical polymerization technique for the preparation of NASICON gels.Experimental / Methods / Procedures Any of the above titles will usually do for this section.The goal is to summarize the WHAT, HOW, and WHY behind your specific experiment, with particular emphasis on the WHAT and HOW so that other researchers can repeat your procedures if they so desire.As necessary, this section includes a description of the relevant apparatus and materials used, and photographs and diagrams could be used, sparingly, to help clarify the procedures.Stylistically, passive voice and past tense verbs are essential in this section, but be sure that your sentences are written efficiently and contain simple subjects and verbs when possible.
The basic form of directly saying "what was done; why it was done that way" should be used over and over in the "Experimental" section.Here is an ideal sentence from the "Experimental" section of an engineering report: After the dispersion thickened it was poured into molds coated with Vaseline to prevent sticking.Finally, subsections, perhaps numbered, are often used to aid in the organization of the material.2 Materials Results For most readers, this is the most important section of the report—your readers must easily find your results in order to interpret them.Here you straightforwardly present the results of your experiment, usually with minimal discussion.
Who can help me write a college pedagogy thesis proposal 8 hours nbsp
Naturally, the use of tables, graphs, and figures is especially enlightening here, as are explanations of how data were derived: The conductivities of the top and bottom values for each measurement were averaged and the results are listed in Table 3.Take care not to include your experimental methods here—that is the job of the previous section.
Discussion Often this section is combined with "Results" into one "Results and Discussion" section; this allows you to interpret your results as you summarize them .
Discussion Often this section is combined with "Results" into one "Results and Discussion" section; this allows you to interpret your results as you summarize them.
Logical deductions must be made, errors of or ambiguities in the data should be discussed, and even simple causal relationships must be confirmed.It is important here not to rely on a table or figure to do the work for you—you must outrightly and concisely interpret 6 days ago - Who can help me write a college pedagogy thesis proposal 8 hours writing from scratch academic to purchase a thesis proposal pedagogy original 24 hours business double spaced sophomore; Where to purchase an pedagogy thesis proposal professional 52 pages / 14300 words standard academic 9 .It is important here not to rely on a table or figure to do the work for you—you must outrightly and concisely interpret.Beware of making sweeping generalizations or unfounded statements.Again, passive voice may seem tempting here, but active voice can be highly valuable, especially as you make a logical assertion: Obviously, the formation of the protective layer prevented rapid oxidation.As a rule, use past tense to summarize your actual results; use present tense to present established facts or present your interpretations ("The helium sintering data show .
Finally, consider referring back to the key literature of your introduction or literature review in this section.Enlighten your readers (and perhaps even elevate your work) by discussing your results in relation to the published results of others.
Conclusions In "Discussion" you supplied your reasoning; now you present the exact conclusions you have arrived at as they relate to your experimental objectives.Conclusions may be listed and numbered, and it should be made clear how they contribute to the understanding of the overall problem.In a sense, you are going back to the big picture provided by your introduction now, incorporating your conclusions into that picture, even suggesting where more work is needed.This section may be short—often about the same length as the abstract.The following is an excerpt from the "Conclusions" section of a report: These results confirm the hypothesis posed in the Introduction: that the shock sensitivity of this explosive is probably not due to the weakening of the phenyl ring by the substituents.
It is possible, however, that mechanical properties such as the coefficient of friction, uniaxial yield stress, and hardness greatly influence the explosive’s shock sensitivity.Further work is needed in this area to determine .Acknowledgments If appropriate, briefly recognize any individual or institution that contributed directly to the completion of the research through financial support, technical assistance, or critique.
In a thesis, this section may appear just before the introduction.References List cited sources on a References page using the Author–Year or Number system (see Chapter 5of this handbook).Appendices If necessary, use an "Appendices" section to present supplementary material that was not included in the main body of the report because it would have detracted from the efficient or logical presentation of the text, usually either by sheer bulk or level of relevance.A typical appendix would be a list of organizations relevant to the material of the report, or a list of symbols used in the text, or the derivation of an equation that was used in the text but could not be referenced because it did not originally appear in a standard text.As with figures and tables, appendices should be numbered or lettered in sequence; i.